As another season draws to a close, the Maddogs set aside an evening dedicated to pastime perhaps even more important than cricket - dinner - in order to relfect on the season's exploits. Our President and founder Giles Bourne took time to call out a number of the stand-out endeavours of a season that saw a very respectable tally of five wins from seven.
[Giles: insert notes of speech here]
But it also brought an opportunity to recall my first game for the 'Dogs back in 2006 - here was my report for the match:
The 2006 Birchgrove Ashes
Six months later, the Ashes defeat still stings badly down under. This was more than evident at the recent Alan Border Medal Awards night – the annual Cricket Australia love-in and back-slapping fest in Sydney. As part of the festivities former English Spin bowler and heroic drug taker, Phil Tuffnell, was invited to pay Australian Captain Rickey Ponting, or “The Punter”, a tribute as he was in Australia, apparently on a drinking tour.
On video, at a bar, Phil teased “The Punter” harmlessly about one of the lost tests, relishing the decision he took to put England into bat after winning the toss, and England promptly scored 477! “Nice one Punter, cheers mate” said Tuffnell. Could Mr Ponting see the funny side? Could he f$%#! He held an impromptu press conference on how inappropriate the comment was on their special night.
This dramatic sense of humour failure was not lost on another group of English cricket players – of which I was one – as they prepared the ground for their own admittedly smaller scale – but no less important - Ashes contest in Balmain this weekend. As the email sledging between the Australians and the Poms escalated in the days before, the
English captain asked if the Australians might get too upset. The Australian captain did reply – tongue in cheek –
“I had thought it was clearly understood that this was to be one-way traffic. If we are expected to put up with the deeply upsetting comments being fired at us, then anyhumour in the situation has completely disappeared. The rules are the rules. You are the good natured bumbling self deprecating types and we are the arrogant aggressive upstarts – evenly balanced with a chip on each shoulder. If we can’t even get the basic stereotypes right what hope does this fixture have.”
Stereotypes do indeed flourish when pitting nation against nation. The sledging – which included references to Mr Jardine and the Bodyline tour - had underlined it: the English never washed, the Australians were bad losers. It was clear on the morning of the game that there were two quite different people playing. The Poms all arrived early and quickly set about practicing their catching; the Australians were late and made no such effort. The Poms had a couple of nets sessions – at the SCG – and the Australians deliberately put in no practice whatsoever. The Poms arrived with special shirts organised with three lions (finally, I had ‘three lions on my shirt’!) and “Birchgrove
Ashes 2006” emblazoned on them; the Australians had no such uniform, and one didn’t even wear shoes! The Poms all had quiet nights before hand, the Australians showed no such diligence, with one player not even making it home. All of that, of course, is what makes the absolute thrashing we received so hard to stomach!
The Poms won the toss and put the Aussies into bat – an ironic reprise of the stuff of Mr Tufnell’s taunt as it turned out. The players took the field and the match began with the first ball bowled at 11.30am. There can be few finer grounds in Sydney – the SCG included – for a game of cricket (in my humble opinion). Set deep in the richest depths of Balmain, the Birchgrove Oval borders Louisa Road where Acting Royalty Brian Brown and Rachel Ward live, and is not far from Judy Davis. Surrounded by beautiful
The first session saw a consistent batting effort from the Australians but a couple of early wickets buoyed the Poms whose team spirit was strong after bonding sessions in the nets and in the pub – classic ex-pat espirit-de-corps. The Australians shuffled out casually one after the other and hit consistently, but their laissez-fair demeanour very effectively lulled the Poms into a false sense of security. There was no indication of the thrashing that was afoot.
For my own part, I think I gave a reasonably good account of myself. In these things its always most important not to let the team down. I did bowl three overs, and was accredited with a wicket; but feel the bowler is only accredited with the catch in the event of a grand master plan – of which I had none. I took my own catch a little later. I was thrilled until I realised that the lack of plaudits on this occasion was due to the fact that it didn’t count, it was the batsman’s first ball – so he wasn’t allowed to be out! When an opportunity did come my way I botched it by running in to meet it, only to watch it go over my head and land exactly where I was standing in the first place – to much hilarity from the Australian pavilion.
As the first forty overs came to an end, the Australians – which we soon discovered
included a semi-pro pair of brothers – accrued an impressive 213 runs. But the Poms remained confident – continueing in the belief that we had a strong batting line-up. Only a fairly comedic double-ended run-out disaster in the last over of the Australian innings betrayed the reality of the rout that was to ensue.
But first there was BBQ sausages – or ‘snags’ – and beers to be enjoyed as both teams briefly forgot the battle and enjoyed each other’s company – and that of their wives, girlfriends and children who had by then arrived to witness the contest.
Then the slaughter began. At first the main problem was that the thick grass and the very accurate – and deceptively slow – bowling conspired to mean that the openers simply weren’t getting the required run rate of six-an-over consistently enough. But while hope would always suggest this might pick up, that hope started to recede as the wickets came.
One after another, key batsmen fell and with each new scalp the confidence of the Poms and the Aussies took equal and opposite trajectories. It even got to the point where – job clearly comprehensively done – an esky of beer was appropriated and positioned behind one of the wickets and thus the Australians added to their fielding strength a collection of beer bottles scattered around the ground. With every ball right on target, each ambitious attempt to score runs – requiring a big hit to get over the thick grass – was met by that most soul destroying of all noises, the destruction of one’s wicket.
My batting efforts were back-dropped by the mood of depression and pessimism that pervaded the English camp by the time I went in, at number 10 with only 80-odd runs scored. After settling in after an over or two and with one or two runs under my belt, I
It is ironic that all the time, the radio in the pavilion played to deaf ears the story of “The Punter” and his men making a stand against Sri Lanka following a disastrous 3 for 10 opening to go on to score 300-odd runs to win the match. If only we’d listened, it might have brought some inspiration.
Nevertheless, the bon-homerie, the weather and the setting meant everyone thoroughly enjoyed themselves – especially considering the slipping, falling and clumsiness that accompanies the later stages of a beer-fuelled encounter. Both teams retired to the alternative pavilion – the nearby William Wallace Hotel – for the presentations.
The Birchgrove Ashes has little in common with the real deal. Despite the torching of a bail on the BBQ, the cup contained no ashes. Also, the well-earned (or is that ‘urned’?) award actually gets to reside with the winning captain and not in thousands of miles away. But certainly what does remain consistent is the heart-felt passion and desire behind the now annual competition.
Bring on 2007 – and go on the Poms!